![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||
| Vol 1. No 3, August 3002
Industry News |
for previous articles, visit the
Infrastructure Preservation News archives and V&A's web site at www.vaengr.com |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessing the Real Impacts of H2S
on Wastewater Collection Systems An important naturally occurring process in wastewater Thiobacilli bacteria quickly convert the H2S to sulfuric acid (H2SO4), a colorless, oily liquid that reacts exothermically with water. As hydrogen sulfide levels rise, bacteria colonies proliferate, forming an extremely corrosive “slime layer” that can rapidly cause weakening and decomposition of even the most massive concrete and steel structures. Concrete corrosion is perpetuated when hydrated calcium sulfate hydroxide, known as ettringite, is formed in the contact zone between the soft calcium sulfate layer and the sound, uncorroded concrete surface. The ettringite that forms in wastewater systems is a soft but expansive white substance that occupies more space than its constituent elements. As it forms, the ettringite forces the corroded concrete away from the sound concrete and greatly accelerates the corrosion process by continually exposing fresh surfaces to attack by sulfuric acid. In most cases, the worst deterioration of the concrete can be seen just downstream from transitions and other turbulent areas (e.g. manholes, drop inlets, etc.) due to H2S off-gassing. Usually, the extent of the damage is not known until a detailed inspection and analysis is carried out. Only then is it possible to design an appropriate and cost-effective plan to arrest and correct the degradation. Concrete Conditions: The V&A Inspection and Rating System Due to the prevalent high concentrations of atmospheric hydrogen sulfide, entry into corrosion-impacted structures requires a self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) and a confined-space permit. During the inspection, the structures are evaluated for structural integrity and samples of the degraded concrete are removed and analyzed. The pH of the concrete samples is measured and often the samples of corroded concrete have pH values of 2 or less; for comparison, new concrete typically has a pH of around 12. Over a period of a dozen years, V&A has gradually developed a visual standard system for characterizing the type and amount of degradation observed on the H2S-exposed interior surfaces of concrete tanks, pipes etc., based on the overall appearance of the concrete; loss of hardness; smoothness; cracking; spalling; and condition of reinforcing steel. These standards and the associated rating system are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. The V&A Concrete Condition Rating System
By factoring in these many conditions, the consultant can prepare a quantitative evaluation of the structure. This in turn guides the consultant and owner in choosing the best strategy for corrective action. Having an objective, quantitative evaluation of the structures has another value for the facility owner as well. It helps the utility or municipality prepare to comply with the new GASB 34 (Government Accounting Standards Board, Statement No. 34) and CMOM (“Capacity, Management, Operations, and Maintenance”) regulations, which will soon require condition ratings and computer-based management systems for virtually all municipal assets, including civil infrastructure. Choosing a Corrective Strategy Rehabilitation. If the structural integrity has not been compromised, most corrosion-damaged facilities can be successfully rehabilitated. The structure will have to be cleaned, using either an abrasive blast or a high-pressure water blast. Lost mortar cover must be replaced. An especially prevalent option to control the effects of H2S corrosion is by the selective use of materials less susceptible to H2S corrosion. Corrosion-resistant materials include protective linings (such as PVC), nitrile rubber gaskets, protective coatings (such as epoxies, enamels, polyurethanes, and bitumastics), and a wide range of fiberglass and ceramic products. All of these materials can be used to rehabilitate the structures in question and prolong their remaining life. Usually, it costs less to rehabilitate a structure than to replace it. Replacement. Replacement of a structure may be the only option available, especially if structural integrity has diminished to the “point of no return.” Replacement costs are generally higher than rehabilitation costs. However, replacement may also create an opportunity to gain a longer-lived facility that will be easier and less costly to maintain. Chemical Treatment. Numerous chemicals are now available that can be added to the sanitary sewer flows to mitigate and/or control the effects of hydrogen sulfide corrosion. Addition of chemicals such as sodium hydroxide, sodium hypochlorite, hydrogen peroxide, potassium permanganate, and air can be used to reduce H2S levels. Less H2S will mean less slime layer and thus less corrosion and less degradation of concrete and metallic structures. The downside is that chemical treatment does require a continual effort, it poses a health risk to the maintenance staff, and it may increase recurring maintenance costs significantly. Bottom Line _______________________________________________________________________________________ V&A Consulting Engineers |
|||||||||||||||||||